Without Brigata
Local speed becomes system drag- 01Plans live in prompts and conversations
- 02Architecture and ownership drift between sessions
- 03Humans reconstruct evidence and decide when “done” is real
For engineering teams and solo developers
You approve the plan. Brigata scopes work across specialized agents, enforces contracts, runs tests and reviews, and returns evidence you can accept—or stop.

Founding customer previewGuided onboarding · local-first · customer-controlled compute.
Founding preview
The coordination inversion
Each person can generate code faster. The organization still has to keep intent, architecture, ownership, dependencies, security, integration, and acceptance aligned across every session.
Every agent starts from a different prompt, branch, and slice of product truth.
Interfaces, ownership, and architecture drift before anyone sees the conflict.
Duplicate work and incompatible decisions surface late during review and integration.
Senior engineers become dispatchers, diff readers, and forensic investigators.
Without Brigata
Local speed becomes system dragWith Brigata
The system governs the loopWithout a shared delivery authority, agentic velocity compounds ambiguity. Brigata turns the team’s output into one accountable system.
The end of status extraction
Brigata already holds what a standup tries to reconstruct—approved plans, scoped claims, dependencies, review verdicts, test results, failures, and acceptance receipts. Anyone who needs status—teammate, founder, PMO—reads the same evidence-backed state instead of asking the room.
No longer recited
Carried into the room
Two decisions. No recitals.
When the team is one person
With several agents acting as architect, builder, reviewer, tester, and researcher, a solo developer can become the product owner, dispatcher, integrator, and final safety net all at once.
Start with one real project
We review every inquiry personally and reply from hello@brigata.dev to arrange a short fit conversation. You do not need to install anything first.
There is no fixed self-serve price yet. Founding engagements are scoped individually, with cost and responsibilities agreed before onboarding.
For the reader who wants the whole model
The sections below preserve the detailed operating model: lifecycle receipts, coordination mechanics, trust boundaries, and the reasoning behind Brigata. The separate technical overview goes further into architecture, recovery, and authority.
Read the technical overviewThe governed delivery loop
Brigata treats planning, contracts, execution, review, and acceptance as durable product state—not chat history that disappears when an agent session ends.
A human approves the outcome, boundaries, and acceptance criteria before autonomous delivery starts.
Architecture and security shape the work, then contracts freeze the seams parallel builders must honor.
Role-based workers receive least-broad context, explicit ownership, and controlled tool permissions.
Tests, security review, integration, and functional verification produce evidence instead of optimistic status.
The approved result, evidence, decisions, and remaining risks become durable project knowledge.
Coordination is the moat
Claims, dependencies, contracts, and evidence make parallel work visible before changes collide. Brigata blocks uncertainty instead of silently integrating it.
Customer-controlled execution
Brigata owns the delivery discipline. It does not run customer worker tasks or repository code on Brigata-operated cloud workers.
Customer-controlled compute
Brigata authority
Customer-selected model providers and worker engines follow the access, privacy, and data-handling policies you configure.
Built by Turtleback Research
Nick Cosimano and Turtleback Research began building Brigata while operating specialized agent teams against real software repositories. Faster code generation exposed a harder problem: preserving architecture, ownership, evidence, and recovery across every session.
Brigata is being dogfooded as its own delivery authority. Failures become durable evidence, product repairs, and regression coverage—not a polished demo path that disappears when the network or coordinator restarts.
Founding preview
Early access is a hands-on product relationship around a real delivery problem—not a waitlist for a finished SaaS dashboard.
Solo developers, technical founders, engineering teams, agencies, and platform groups already using several coding-agent sessions and feeling the cost of coordination, review, or recovery.
Brigata has a working local execution and coordination pipeline under active acceptance testing. Onboarding is guided while packaging, workstation surfaces, and product boundaries continue to harden.
Neither. Brigata replaces status extraction: the reconstruction work where people re-derive who is doing what, what state it is in, and what is stuck, then re-type it into meetings and PMO reports. Because plans, claims, dependencies, reviews, tests, failures, and acceptance receipts are governed state, status is read rather than collected—and standups keep the human work of decisions, priorities, risk, and unblocking. A meeting stops being a database query performed on people.
Repositories, worktrees, builds, tests, provider credentials, and worker processes remain on customer-controlled infrastructure. Brigata records coordination state and evidence without taking custody of source execution.
The current governed runtime is built around Cline, with Claude Code CLI available as an optional adapter. The architecture supports additional governed adapters only after their execution, audit, and recovery contracts are proven.
Hands-on technical onboarding, direct access to the product team, a real delivery problem used to pressure-test the system, and meaningful influence over early priorities. Brigata is not yet generally available or sold through fixed pricing tiers.
We review the inquiry personally and reply from hello@brigata.dev to arrange a short fit conversation. No installation is required before that conversation, and sharing detailed source code is neither required nor requested.
There is no fixed self-serve price yet. Founding engagements are scoped individually; scope, cost, access, and responsibilities are agreed before onboarding begins.
Ready to compare this with your workflow?